On 1/28/2015 3:35 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
AG writes:
Ah, but there is still a difference. Primary advantage is that the camera knows which way to turn the focus and a
general idea of how far.
Single AF on EM-1 with a native MFT lens uses only CDAF, AFAIK.
That's what I thought.
Continuous AF on EM-1--nobody has been quite sure but a few interviews with Oly
revealed it is a mix of PDAF and CDAF with native MFT lenses. Hit rate seems very slightly better than EM-5. As frame
rate is also higher for EM-1--probably significantly more frames in focus. ...
Why not fast hybrid single AF, Mike
I think you need to ask Oly.
One guess - it wasn't any faster.
Second guess - saving it as a new feature of the E-M5II - in which role it
would work whether faster or not.
Guess It's Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|