Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus Futures

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus Futures
From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayne.harridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:18:36 +1100
Certainly Canon p*ssed off a lot of FD users !

...Wayne



-----Original Message-----
From: olympus
[mailto:olympus-bounces+wayne.harridge=structuregraphs.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
] On Behalf Of Moose
Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2015 5:22 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus Futures


Indeed, and that would not be true if they had retained their MF register
distance, as Nikon, Minolta, Canon, Pentax and others did. But Canon had bit
that bullet early. Just when you said Pentax did the right thing, they did
the opposite. 
When Canon went AF with film, they abandoned their FD mount for one with the
shortest register distance of any FF SLR. 
There was much screaming and gnashing of teeth at the time, but as they
became the universal recipient of adapted lenses from other mounts and their
own AF mount was very successful, it became clear they had made a great
business decision.

  Winners Write the History Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz