Re: [OM] Food for thought

[Chuck Norcutt]

They're all good but 3 & 4 are the strongest.  I think I'd experiment 
with adding a bit more saturation to 4 while being careful not to add 
too much.
Chuck Norcutt


On 3/28/2015 3:27 PM, ChrisB wrote:
> Likewise, Brian.  Good luck getting them included.
>
> Chris
>
> > On 28 Mar 2015, at 14:44, Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I’m partial to 3 & 4.
> >
> > --Bob Whitmire
> > Certified Neanderthal
> >
> > On Mar 28, 2015, at 5:32 AM, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > Our local Civic Museum is hosting a photographic exhibition starting 4 June,
> > > with the subject "Food for Thought".
> > >
> > > I thought I had nothing to offer, but on reflection and after a bit of activity,
> > > came up with these.
> > >
> > > http://www.brianswale.com/zuikoholics/FFT/FFT.htm
> > --
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/