Unilenses usually aren't f2.8
On Apr 10, 2015 3:02 PM, "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I didn't buy them for portraits as that's something I rarely do anymore.
> The last photo I took that I'd call a formal portrait is here <
> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=16948> It's a couple of
> friends from almost 2 years ago. Canon 5D but with Tamron 24-135 at 59mm.
> Is that what you call a "uni-lens". Looks OK to me. :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 4/10/2015 2:18 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>
>> However, neither of my native lenses can do that. The
>>> 28-150 is at f/5.6 at 50mm and the 12-50 is at f/6.3 at 50mm... overly
>>> deep
>>> DoF. However, a head shot at 5 feet would require very careful focusing
>>> even at f/8. And, although I haven't used them, I do own 50mm OMZ
>>> lenses in
>>> abundant supply.
>>>
>>
>> For portraiture, those uni-lenses are generally useless.
>>
>> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|