Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 4/3 format is lousy for portraits - dof

Subject: Re: [OM] 4/3 format is lousy for portraits - dof
From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:33:55 -0500
Moose grunted:
> You make a mistake in assuming that AG was responding directly and only to
> what you wrote. He has a larger audience composed of a vast array of various
> kinds of naysayers and opinionaters. How many of them exist in the outside
> world and how many only in his head, we (and he) will never know for sure.
> ;-)

OK, I can do a legitimate example. Scroll down to the bottom for the
sample image:

http://zone-10.com/cmsm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=237&Itemid=97

More?

http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=12424
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=14311
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=16533
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=16529
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=16523
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=16525

Sometimes, narrow DoF is a crutch for portraiture.
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=16527
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=16531

I can scare up a whole lot more examples of what can be done with 4/3.


> There's a certain 'voice' he adopts  when stepping up on the soapbox. The
> orations are almost always interesting, often informative, but rather unlike
> simple, direct responses to the meat of any question of comment that pushed
> that particular button. :-)

Am I that transparent?

I get paid really good money to have a decent soapbox at work. You
ain't seen nothing.





-- 
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz