Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] QRY: Feedback needed on crop

Subject: Re: [OM] QRY: Feedback needed on crop
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 20:28:22 +0800
Same here, I would make a narrow strip of 53:18, crop it from top. In this
B/W image, the plants in the foreground are not very well defined, shifting
the center of interest is better for me.

C.H.Ling


----- Original Message ----- From: "David Bell" <david.w.bell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


Ok in my personal view......... I would lose a chunk of the foreground in
favour of the big sky. I feel as if my eye is having to negotiate an
obstacle to get to my point of interest which is the ribbon of the
settlement / town buildings etc. The big sky is a defining part of the
image of the place whereas the planting prominence is as a result of
deliberate camera angle. A narrower band of fields would still imply that
it was part of a larger rolling landscape and give that context to the
place but for me the foreground is in my peripheral vision of the main
object of interest i.e. the buildings group.

Dave




On 25/05/2015 10:54, Philippe wrote:
TIA for letting me know which of these crops works better, if either
does, and why if you have time to explain.
FYI, my doubts come from a different perception when seen small or large,
so thanks for your precious feedback.

SWH 2
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Doulce+France/Somewhereheim--2.jpg.html
SWH 3
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Doulce+France/Somewhereheim--3.jpg.html

Amities
Philippe, sorry for duplicates.

--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz