On 5/23/2015 1:24 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
Moose will probably suffer a coronary with the "obvious" processing,
but so be it. I'll call it artistic license.
You do me a disservice - as you well know. :-)
I'm not sure I LIKE like it, but it's a nice example of the style.
Any processing artifact that's not part of the intent seems to me to detract from the image. Those that are part of the
intent either work or not as art, but aren't objectionable to me per se.
Hence, for example, my comment(s) on wildly processed sunset/cloud/whatever images that only point out the halos on the
skyline.
Self Explanatory Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|