I’m seeing more and more canvas out there, but metal seems to be the thing that
really catches the eye. Some of your OTT stuff would look dashing on metal,
especially the gloss surface. I have one OTT of the local lighthouse that sold
well on metal, and not much on anything else.
—Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal
On May 30, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I await the results of your fieldwork. At the very least it’s rewarding to
>> talk to customers.
>
> I'll have sufficient variety to get a feeling for what people around
> here are interested in.
>
> I'm going to throw a couple big panos out there, and probable have
> Millers do them up on canvas. Karen is telling me that I should do up
> another print of the Chicago John Hancock Building, but have it done
> on metal.
>
> From what I've been gathering, straight photographs aren't moving
> well, but OTT processing is. I'll do both. If I have time, I'll do
> some B&W prints. Those are great because my cost is so low and they
> can be used to sell darkroom services. (cross-sell).
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|