Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-D E-M5 II video shooting [Was: Video shooting by E-M5]

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-D E-M5 II video shooting [Was: Video shooting by E-M5]
From: Michael Wong <mialop.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 16:31:06 +0800
Thanks CH, let me search its detail :-)



Cheers,
Michael

On 3 June 2015 at 16:19, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If you don't need the long reach (400mm) you can try RX-10 (24-200mm
> F2.8), it has a better lens and more solid body. May be not as fast as the
> FZ1000 in operation.
>
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Wong" <mialop.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>  I do think the picture quality of FZ1000 is pretty good after watching
>> these samples.
>> http://www.dchome.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1295297&extra=page%3D1
>> (just for photo samples)
>>
>> Yup, up to now, FZ1000 is a better choice.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>>
>> On 3 June 2015 at 15:43, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  You can have hours of video on a 32GB SDHC card if you shoot 1080p, only
>>> 4K video take you 100Mb/S. It is 8xxg with a 25-400mm F2.8-4 lens, you
>>> won't get anything close to this with your M4/3 system. To be fair, the
>>> lens may not be very good for still but for video it is fine.
>>>
>>> It is totally unacceptable for any device that is not capable of playing
>>> AVCHD today. If you really worry about AVCHD you can use MP4 anytime,
>>> there
>>> is an option to shoot MP4 on FZ1000.
>>>
>>>
>>> C.H.Ling
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Wong" <mialop.wong@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>  Thanks CH.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Upon search information about Panasonic FZ1000 from internet, seems it
>>>> is
>>>> the best choice under HK$8,000 (HK wholesaler) or HK$6,000 (parallel
>>>> import) for both still image & video shooting except its weight over
>>>> 800g.
>>>>
>>>> The maximum recording time  will be a concern for the videos for
>>>> working,
>>>> I
>>>> have found a post in dpreview that if 40 mins for 32GB SDXC card is
>>>> acceptable.
>>>> http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3711308
>>>>
>>>> Another concern of playing AVCHD & convert it to other format, it should
>>>> be
>>>> solved.
>>>> http://www.iskysoft.com/article/avchd-player-for-mac.html
>>>> http://www.winxdvd.com/resource/play-avchd-on-mac.htm
>>>>
>>>> However, related the disadvantages of playing back AVCHD video directly
>>>> on
>>>> Mac OS in the 2nd article, my Apple cinema is old type 20" with 1680 x
>>>> 1050. That means I have to convert the AVCHD video every time before
>>>> playing? Oh! My God!
>>>>
>>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz