That’s excellent news! To read between the Greater Lines, it would seem that
Fuji has been admitted to the Arena of Greater Players by the Overlords In
Charge of Such Stuff. That’s all the better for me, because should I decide to
kit up to a greater degree, it will be with Fuji.
—Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal
On Jun 7, 2015, at 10:51 AM, ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And by the same token, Bob, I’m happy with the way Fuji is interpreted by
> both Aperture and Capture One; I think that each gives me a slightly
> different result but I couldn’t swear to it and either makes me happy.
>
> Chris
>
>> On 7 Jun 15, at 14:29, Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I’m now on the LRCC and PSCC subscription iterations, and am shooting
>> exclusively with Fuji X-100s, and I _think_, though I’m too lazy to do
>> much—if any—research, that the Immortal Ones at Adobe have Graciously
>> Accepted that Fuji is the Real Thing. I have had no complaints when
>> processing X-100s files through LR and PS. I have noted that my first step
>> in the post-processing flow is to drop all the way to the bottom of the
>> development tool panel and fiddle with the Camera Calibration module. I seem
>> to get better results when using Fuji film emulation settings than Adobe
>> Standard.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|