Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMG: Mercury II

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Mercury II
From: Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:38:23 -0500
My Mercury II is stored away, and I'm not sure which box it is in. If I recall correctly, the lens can be unscrewed. I'm not sure if this holds for the original Mercury. At one time, I considered adapting the Tricor lens to use on my Leica LTM. One of the expensive California camera shops at one time had a Tricor in Leica mount, but wanted too much money for it.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 7/2/2015 2:27 PM, David Young wrote:
Interesting story on the Univex Box Camera, Jim!

My old Mercury does not work - never has as long as I've had it (40+ years) and 
not worth repairing. At least, not to me.

I have a friend (also a Jim) who says "Ask me for anything out of metal, and I'll 
make it for you.  As me for something made out of wood, and I'll build you a fire."

Having seen your image from the Mercury's lens, I'm now stroking my chin about 
dismembering the old Mercury and having him make and adapter to the E-M1.  
Could be an interesting experiment!

David.

You certainly came up with cameras that I have never seen before! Your
Dad's camera looks to be a very nice example of the later folders.  I
almost bought a Retina II when I was in the market for a 35 in 1952.

As a child of 8 or 9, I received a Christmas gift of a small, plastic
Univex box camera that used Size 00 roll film, about the size of 35mm,
but paper backed, with no sprocket holes.  The film had to be returned
to the company for processing.  I still have an image of my grandparents
that must have come from that camera, because it is the only one I had
at that time.  That was the same company that later became Universal
Camera.

See my response to Rick Beckrich for an example of a Mercury II image.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 7/2/2015 1:45 PM, David Young wrote:
G'Mornin' again, Jim!

When I was in my teens (lo, those many years ago) I did a fair amount of 
spelunking, too, but never with a camera.

I found it interesting that you should refer people to the Camerapedia for more 
on the Mercury II.

I am not a camera collector, I am a shooter.  But over the years I have been given four 
"oldies", and three of 'em have wound up in the Camerapedia.

An old (and damaged) Birnbaum Perforetta,

http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Perforetta

A Debrie Sept:

http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Debrie_Sept

and my dad's old 1950 Beauty Six (later sold as the Frank Six)  folder, now 
acknowledged, both in the Camerapedia and elsewhere, to be one of only two such 
cameras surviving in the world.  And certainly the only one with it's original 
box and ever-ready case intact.

http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Frank_Six

Actually, my dad gave me the Beauty Six in the mid-80's.  He told me that he'd owned 6 cameras, but 
when I was 12, I had taken them all apart, to see what made them "tick".  The Beauty Six 
was the only one I'd managed to get back together, in working order!  Thus he felt, at that point, 
that I should have it!  It may not be my "go to" camera, but it is still my most 
treasured one.

David


Hi David,
When my sons were in their teens, and into exploring caves, I rigged the
Mercury II with a cheap flash gun (bulbs), and they took it into the
caves with them.

It still works, though scanning the single-frame negatives is a real
challenge. :-(

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 7/2/2015 12:52 PM, David Young wrote:
Thanks, Jim, for that information!  I have an old Mercury 1, and had always 
wondered why it used the style of shutter that it did. Now, I know!;

David.

Some of you might be able to recall, as I do, street photographers who
snapped your photo on city sidewalks and then offered to sell you copies
of the image.  Their favorite camera was the Universal Mercury,
introduced in 1938, or the Mercury II, introduced in 1945. A half-frame
camera with a rotary cinema-type shutter, it produced 72 images on a
36-exposure roll of 35mm film.  This was a very rugged camera with a
cast aluminum body and an extremely sharp Tricor 35mm f/2.7 lens,
requiring manual scale focusing with no rangefinder.  When properly
focused, the image detail was equivalent to much more expensive cameras
of that era.

http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Mercury+II+from+1945.jpg.html

Comments welcomed, and appreciated.

--
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz