I agree, except the reviews I've seen suggest the EVF is much higher
resolution on the IV.
And we're getting a new puppy Thursday, and a new grandchild early in
November, so I'm thinking I might like an increased video capacity. I've
taken more than a few videos of Norah with my iPhone, and they pretty much
stink, except they're of her, which elevates their appeal, at least to her
family. <g>
--Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 8/9/2015 2:05 PM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
>
>> So, are there any engineers in the room that can put forth a convincing
>> argument against the new Sony DSC-RX100 IV?
>>
>> Looks like a near perfect camera for the upper right pocket of my
>> motorcycle jacket.
>>
>
> The question might be asked why you don't already have a III. :-)
>
> The IV is all about faster, higher FPS, 4K video, and so on. DPreview's
> comparator doesn't show me any IQ improvement, In fact, a couple of spots
> on their subject look a tiny bit better on the III, likely subtle focus
> differences and/or sample variation, but could be the new sensor optimized
> for speed.
>
> For your use, I imagine a III might actually be better, and certainly
> cheaper.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|