Hi Andrew,
Mine is labeled Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:1.4/50, SN5720518, from
ASAHI OPT.CO., JAPAN. It is M42 mount, and has the Manual/Auto switch
at the rear. The adapter to the E-1 is approx. 1/4 " thick. It is
smaller and lighter than the Leica-R f/2 Summicron, which I also have.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 12/3/2015 2:38 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
Which one? Assuming the K mount Takumar, there’s the original K mount which is not small, the
M type which is and the later A type. All three in front of me now. I sell quite a few
K1000’s at this time of year as they are regarded as the classic student camera here and next
year’s students come in looking for a good one, sent by an art teacher who knows no better.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www.soultheft.com
On 4 Dec 2015, at 5:09 am, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks, Ken. I should have added a comment to view LARGE.
I have always been pleased with the results I got from the Tak 50/1.4. It is
small, and the focus is as smooth as warm butter. The focus, on the E-1, seems
to be better defined than with the Leica lens.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 12/3/2015 12:04 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
Channeling Moose's typical caveats about web-sized images, I like the
tone and the general contrast of the scenes. The first one has a nice
look to it where the leaves look like they are suspended out from my
monitor.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|