ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive

from ChrisB

Subject:	Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive
From:	ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2015 14:10:29 +0000

Grammatically yes, but not in tone or effect.

I did :-)

Chris

> On 23 Dec 2015, at 07:52, Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Chris, I think this is a matter of taste. Gramatically, either way is correct.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, ChrisB Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, ChrisB <= Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Philippe Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Michael Wong Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Chris Trask Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Mike Lazzari Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Michael Wong Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, piclibster Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Jez Cunningham Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, ChrisB

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] zone-10 access outside USA?, Jez Cunningham
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] zone-10 access outside USA?, Ralf Loi
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Andrew Fildes
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Active Voice instead of Passive, Philippe
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]