There is of course an alternative .... Buy an X- Pan... Which I would do in a
heartbeat if I could find on at a price I could afford. Or even the 6 x 18. ?
That Andrew Fides mentioned a long long time ago.
Regards John Duggan, Very wet and windswept Wales.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 7 Feb 2016, at 06:53, ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think I know what you meant by that, Bill. But the Fuji cameras can do
> automatic panoramas, when handled with care, which look pretty good. Also,
> the new X-Pro2 gives you 6,000 x 3,376 pixels in 16:9 mode; that must be
> pretty close to xPan shape. But I think I read somewhere that the X-Pro2
> does not have the builit-in panorama facility . . .
>
> Chris
>
>>
>> And honestly what I really want is for Fuji to build a digital version
>> of the xPan
>> With maybe AF and white bal. Like that's going to happen.
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|