Thanks for that link, Mike.
I used the 56 at a BBQ on Saturday, to photograph the host who was playing a
guitar (Rowland). It was quick to focus on my X-Pro1 and the results look
good, but I’ve looked only at a monitor-size example, without looking at 100%.
I’ll continue testing.
Chris
> On 26 Jul 16, at 00:08, Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Both lenses look excellent but the 56 seems to indeed have a secret sauce.
> If I were shooting Fuji, perhaps I'd opt for the APD version. Ran across
> this comparison:
>
> http://www.fujivsfuji.com/60mm-f2pt4-vs-56mm-f1pt2/
> <http://www.fujivsfuji.com/60mm-f2pt4-vs-56mm-f1pt2/>
>
> Look forward to your observations.
>
> I love the Fuji glass and ergonomics, but MFT glass has tiny excellent or
> larger faster options and tiny or more full features bodies. If carrying
> something larger may as well go FF.
> Optimal conversion of the raw files would result in disruption of my work
> flow which is not possible right now due to time constraints, but no wrong
> answers with all these excellent choices.
>
> Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|