Still the madness........different.
----- Original Message -----From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>To: Olympus Camera
Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 22:57:28 -0000
(UTC)Subject: [OM] Pick Your Poison [was And Now for Something . . .]
Pick it. <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/Miscellaneous/PtArenaLight.htm>
On 8/12/2016 5:14 AM, Ken Norton wrote:>>> REALLY BAD BANDING!>> Now is that
polite? Even when I think it, I almost never post "REALLY BAD>> NOISE/GRAIN"
about any of your grainy images.> Sorry about the caps. I had the caps on for
something else I was working on.
:-)
>> I THOUGHT it about the OoF background area of your Hosta image. But I know>>
>> you like grain, even add it sometimes, so I take the images as they are,
>> and>> only comment on other aspects.> You bring up a point. On the Hosta
>> image, I exploited the flaws of the> analog process to effect. While those
>> flaws were artificial (NIK> Software),
Hah!, I knew it!
> they were what you would expect to see from an analog> process. The banding
> in your picture is the exploitation of the flaws> of the digital process to
> effect. There really is no difference. Both> pictures are
> fingernails-on-chalkboard.
Tasty Moose
-- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?--
_________________________________________________________________Options:
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympusArchives:
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/Themed Olympus Photo
Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|