Why not go for the 12-60?
2016-09-09 16:00 GMT+02:00 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > *The 14-54 mm F/2.8-3.5 ZD II seems to be identical to its predecessor
> > (without "II"), except for the capability of contrast-detection
> autofocus,
> > used in the Live View. *Wrotniak.net
>
> The Mk2 does have a couple of other tweaks. The aperture stays open
> slightly longer before closing down for the longer focal lengths. The
> blade shape got optimized a little bit and the motor is different.
> There was also an attempt to fix that cross-over point where the life
> got sucked out of the images.
>
> I would prefer a Mk2, but the budget is Mk1. Regardless, either one
> are better than most N/C lenses.
>
> AG Schnozz
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|