Hi Tina,
There certainly is not enough barrel distortion to bother the normal
photographer, but that may result from corrections made by the firmware
of the lens and camera. It doesn't prove that the lens optics are free
of distortion.
My Fuji 35mm f/2 lens does have optical barrel distortion. It doesn't
bother Nathan and others who use software which includes lens
corrections, but it does bug me, as I have to run the file through a
lens correction program before using it.
With your workflow, I see no problems whatever.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 12/24/2016 9:49 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
If the Summilux SL had any barrel distortion, I would think it would show
up in a photo like this:
http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/164740552
All I see is that my windows need to be washed!!
Tina
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/23/2016 6:37 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
L and the T Moose writes:
<<<Now that's better, just less than double what I paid for the body it
would work on. Still, I'll pass. Yet another vintage lens on its way, but
one all about sharpness.
No one else bit on this yet. Any other hints? I gave it a good thunk
but insufficient data. I very much doubt will go on a MFT body so that
mean something for the A7. I have no recollection of your mentioning
such an acquisition.
The other post I made at about the same time is part of the tea leaves.
Brewing Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|