Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Jim's Sonic Booms

Subject: Re: [OM] Jim's Sonic Booms
From: Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 08:44:00 -0600
That's a pretty good summary, Chris. We designed transonic wind tunnels with perforated test section walls to allow us to accelerate through this region, and provided wall suction to prevent choking. The perforated walls also reduced the reflection of shock waves back onto the test model. The Germans preferred slots to perforations in their early designs, and NACA/NASA followed that path. We had the advantage of having Dr. Bernard Goerthert, who led the German research, as our facility director. I first met Dr. Goerthert at Wright Field around 1952, and followed him to Tullahoma when I was released from active duty in 1953. A small scaled model wind tunnel was used to optimize the wall design.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 12/26/2016 8:19 AM, Chris Trask wrote:
      We learned in Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) that the shock wave 
increases drag in the trans-sonic region, about 0.95 to 1.05 times the speed of 
sound, where the shock wave first appears ahead of the leading edge and 
gradually moves to behind the trailing edge.  You're not exactly supersonic 
until the shock wave is behind the trailing edge.

Jim, Does the creation of a sonic boom contribute to an increase in
drag? Or is it a reduction? Or does it drag neutral?


Chris

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
      - Hunter S. Thompson

--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz