Thanks for your comments, Moose. Others have pointed out something
similar, and it is true. But, and perhaps AG and I are the only
disciples, there is something distinctive about the Kodak CCD sensor
that makes its images rise to the top of the pile. My E-1 won't be
abandoned any time soon.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 5/4/2017 5:34 PM, Moose wrote:
On 5/3/2017 8:42 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
Sometimes all advances with cameras and lenses don't really make
progress; the old images just look better. After posting an image
of this bloom yesterday, I looked at one from a year earlier, and
liked it better. So, I took the old Oly E-1 and the older Leica
Elmarit-R 60 Macro out this morning and shot the same bloom. To me,
the colors just blow me away! It's a shame that the old Kodak CCD
sensor couldn't keep up with the demands for higher ISO speeds.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20170503-P5037074.JPG.html
I'm not going to say there is no difference. Although that might be a
good way to get a visit from AG, his mood could be a problem. ;-)
OTOH, there is so much difference in the light that I think it, not
the sensor system, accounts for most of the difference you see.
Contrarian Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
