Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Science and Speculation [was "Moonrise, Hernandez,

Subject: Re: [OM] Science and Speculation [was "Moonrise, Hernandez,
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:16:58 -0700
On 6/20/2017 11:50 AM, brian gray via olympus wrote:
Hi
<I don't think anyone wants do disprove Newton. His laws of motion are correct 
at all speeds less than a significant % of

the speed of light. OTOH, there has been empirical proof of the different 
results of Einstein's Theories that obtain at
higher speeds, but only there.>
Not strictly true. If you use a GPS, you are relying on someone applying General Relativity Theory to the clocks in the satellites going round the world.

That's about lightspeed wave/particles, no? I did read something about how they keep everything synced, but promptly forgot it.

And the digital sensors in our cameras are based on our current scientific models of the universe. All such models can change or be improved, but surely it is unwise to assume the current scientific best guess must be wrong merely because we do not like the consequences it predicts.

No, we don't want to repeat Einstein's "biggest blunder", with the cosmological 
constant.

Muddling Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz