Ah, there’s a good point, Moose: could I have done better?
Well probably not, but I might have been able to take note of all the comments,
suggestions and complaints to improve things, which I believe is what happened
with Fuji’s cameras.
I do know that Oly’s products have improved immeasurably over the last few
years, and not only because you have mentioned some of its products once or
twice ;-). But I am now engaged with Fuji’s kit and unlikely to change (or buy
any more).
And I like the hood on that E-PL2 . . .
Chris
> On 2 Jul 2017, at 18:56, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Panny's Quick Menu isn't as good, but does many things without going into the
> menus. Sony's quick menu (I don't know it's name) is pretty bare bones, but
> still will save menu trips.
>
> I have on occasion asked myself if I could do better . . .
>
>> (nor the look of the early E-PLs . . .).
>
> Most of them were sorta blah to me, but not negative. The exception was the
> E-PL2, with 12-50, at the time, the most handsome Oly camera lens combo since
> a black OM with 35-105.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Tech/Oly_Pens&image=IMG_1215oof30m.jpg
>
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Tech/Oly_Pens&image=IMG_1215oof30m.jpg>>
>
> Dandy Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
