>From a theoretical perspective the photon wells on FF will be much deeper and
>thus lower noise. Also less enlargement required to achieve final viewing
>size so that the aberrations and diffraction effects should be less apparent,
>and thus more effective resolution on FF. Also more diffraction effects
>sooner on the MFT. Many other variables will affect this including the AA
>filter, lenses, technique, ? use of HR mode on MFT. The engineers should
>chime in.
See Maestro Moose post last year:
http://lists.tako.de/Olympus-OM/2016-09/msg00500.html
Especially this Moose rollover:
"I found the same sort of thing, where the slightly higher resolution of the
810 is offset by loads of false color."
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/X-T1_E-M1_D750/FON.htm>
Problem with Oly MFT is that they can't increase the megapickels much more
w/o an AA filter so can use HR mode. They should develop an electronic version
that Nykon has so it can be switched "off"--actually they used an additional
electronic one to exactly cancel the first one. Then we can have our cake and
eat it too.
More cake please, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|