TAKO. INTERNET SEIT 1996.
Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Moosie goes EEEE (and a confession)

Subject: Re: [OM] Moosie goes EEEE (and a confession)
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 20:01:25 -0800
On 3/4/2018 4:35 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
<<It's a reasonably nice looking thingie, less retro cute than the Laowa, the same 
weight, a little shorter and fatter. 
<http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=22599>

I like your shot--nice tones and  great bokeh.

Thanks! Canon FD 55/1.2 @ 1.2, since returned and replaced by the lens I had thought I was buying, the older FL 58/1.2. I left much of the indoor light warmth.

I thought about an OM 55/1.2, but it's a much newer design, and hence less "bad" in good ways. The optical design of the FL lens was released in 1962, in R mount, so it's at least 10 years older than the OM.

Laowa  does win the beauty contest

Eye of the beholder, dood! :-) Well, maybe . . . ;-)

Old Glass Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>