Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] RandOM observation on Zuikos

Subject: Re: [OM] RandOM observation on Zuikos
From: Bill Pearce <billpearce@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 02:34:18 -0400 (EDT)
Some of the best lenses I've ever owned were the Zeiss/Kyocera lenses for the 
Contax G2. If that camera had decent AF, I'd still be using it. 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Mike Gordon via olympus" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Cc: usher99@xxxxxxx 
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 7:29:02 PM 
Subject: Re: [OM] RandOM observation on Zuikos 

I think you are on to something. May explain some shots with very noticeable 
"3D rendering." Many of the C/Y lenses have this in spades. The Loxia have the 
characteristic Zeiss microcontrast but not sure the 3D pop of the C/Y is there. 
Perhaps a similar phenomenon. How does AG come up with this stuff? Makes for 
fun reading anyway. Totally agree though that calculated dof based on thin lens 
approximation and perceived dof are not one in the same. 

Curiously the ye olde c/y 35-70 at the long end has enough resolution for 42 
megapickles. Perhaps the 35/2 does as well --or at least good enough. 

Expanding the randOMness? Mike 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________ 
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus 
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ 
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz