Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Q v. Q [was IMG: Fungi]

Subject: Re: [OM] Q v. Q [was IMG: Fungi]
From: Philippe <photo.philippe.amard@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 08:52:49 +0200
The Olies, read Panas too, are famous for screwing up the blue/magenta/violet 
colours.
Yours is an exception, congrats!

Amities

Philippe



> Le 3 juil. 2018 à 07:21, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> 
> On 7/1/2018 7:58 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> It's not the QUANTITY of the MPs, it's the QUALITY!
> 
> I'm still not entirely convinced. And I'm not interested in comparing to 
> Canon and Fuji cameras, as I have no interest, at this juncture, in owning 
> either. My questions are more along the lines of "What do I gain or lose by 
> moving from the Kodak CCD sensor in the E-1 to the CMOS sensors in the 
> current Oly cameras?"
> 
> Herewith a comparison of E-1, E-300 and E-M5 II, converted in ACR/LR and in 
> the Oly software.* 
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Sensor%20Color/_B050014comp.htm>
> No processing after conversion, all default settings for conversion.
> 
> With the E-1, there's a distinct difference between ACR/LR and Oly Master 2. 
> It's hard to say from this distance in time which is more accurate, although 
> I tend to prefer Master 2.
> 
> E-M5 II with ACR/LR is quite close to E-1, M2, and the differences with V3 
> seem to be of curve, more than color. The E-M5 II ACR/LR version looks to me 
> the best for further processing.
> 
> I bought the E-300 mostly because it was the last Kodak sensor, and has a few 
> more Mpickles than the E-1, so I was curious. It was also very cheap, bundled 
> with the 14-54.
> 
> I'm not sure what happened here, with one blossom changing from purple tones 
> to pink ones. More testing, I suppose.
> 
> I chose this subject for likely difficult to reproduce natural colors. Based 
> on this one test, I can't see any color rendition advantage of E-1 over E-M5 
> II. It seems to me that Oly has done a good job of retaining their 'look'.
> 
> Testy Moose
> 
> * These JPEGs have an aRGB ICC profile. That should work fine with the 
> mainstream browsers and recent displays. They look the same to me in PS and 
> in the browser.
> 
> -- 
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz