I agree. This moth shot worked fine at 1/500.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20180731-DSCF9063.JPG.html
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 8/2/2018 12:12 AM, Moose wrote:
On 8/1/2018 11:48 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
Moose noted that my bee wings were not captured in yesterday's post.
Despite poor light, I went out today to see what effect an increase
from 1/500 to 1/1000 would have on the capture. Here are two shots
that convince me that 1/1000 is about right; the wings are seen but
slightly blurred, giving a sense of motion. YMMV.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20180801-DSCF9081.JPG.html
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20180801-DSCF9084-2.JPG.html
Ah yes, nice.
I suppose the necessary SS may depend on the subject speed of wing
beats. This shot of a hovering fly (that acts like a bee) catches the
wings pretty well @ 1/250. <https://photos.app.goo.gl/mQHge6qWSX3Y31GQ9>
Flying Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
