The problem with discussions about whether the Earth is flat is that they are
just rubbish.
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA
> On 11 Oct 2018, at 21:38, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Here on the east side of the Atlantic, I was not aware of the idea that
>> America was regarded as mainly responsible although we are aware that you
>> seem to have a larger lobby of climate change deniers than most, not least
>> your President. It is however commonly noted that in the USA peoples' views
>> on such matters (or abortion or environmental matters) appear to be much
>> more closely linked to political allegiance than elsewhere.
>
> Tribalism is getting more intense over here. There is not such thing
> as a conversation with anybody that sees things even SLIGHTLY
> differently than you. It will quickly devolve into a "if you voted for
> Trump/Hillary I'm going to unfriend you" type of scenario. In fact,
> there are people on this very list who have said that very thing and I
> just shake my head and say to myself "you are such an idiot."
>
> The problem with discussions about climate change, specifically, is
> that the proponents of "human caused climate change" are wielding it
> like an axe and present themselves as the keepers of all knowledge and
> reason. By setting themselves up as the only intelligent individuals
> in the room, they do little to actually have a conversation and try to
> influence a change of minds. Instead, the attitude is "if you don't
> 100% agree with me or my solutions, you must die."
>
> That's no way to have a conversation.
>
> By telling the other side that they are morons and have no voice in
> the solution, it causes the other side to bunker down and reject
> everything the self-appointed keepers-of-all-wisdom have to say.
>
> Many years ago, I was a supporter/member of the Sierra Club. I was an
> innocent person who actually thought that this organization actually
> wanted to be effective at real issues and concerns. Turns out that
> their only purpose for being (at that time) was to defeat George H.W.
> Bush. Instead of environmental issues, they became a purely political
> organization with absolutely no redeeming value. This came to a head
> when there was a "call to arms" moment on a specific environmental
> issue that was very specific to their charter and they declined to
> have anything to do with it because all of their money and effort was
> being devoted to politics instead. We were literally told to "stand
> down" on what we were doing because they didn't want that
> environmental cleanup effort to be completed before the election.
>
> BTW, some of us can remember when "Acid Rain" was all the
> environmental hype. I guess that doesn't matter anymore...
>
>
>> With regard to climate change itself, I think most people would agree that
>> major climate changes have occurred in the last 4+billion years, but we
>> have to remember that man has not been around for most of that time
>> (according to generally accepted modern science), and while some people
>> might survive another ice-age an unmoderated rise in temperatures would
>> appear likely to be disastrous for many and those living near current sea
>> levels (including major capitals like London and New York) amongst the
>> first to suffer.
>
> This would assume two things:
> 1. The human race is NOT adaptive to change.
> 2. The human race is unable to physically move.
>
> An ice age will just mean that "Burlington Coat Factory" will sell
> more coats. Global warming will mean that "Speedo" will sell more
> swimsuits.
>
> Rising waters just means that coastal cities will just migrate up the
> hill over time. All you have to do is look at pictures and maps of
> cities from 50 years ago and you can see just how much they've changed
> in that period. Cities and people are NOT STATIC.
>
> Honestly, if we're REALLY serious about climate change and energy
> waste, we should totally ban Bitcoin and jail or kill everybody
> involved in Bitcoin Mining.
>
> AG Schnozz
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|