At 1/13/2019 01:55 PM, you wrote:
><<I would like a similar lens but with autofocus, F2 or faster. I had much
>better
><<success with the 90/2.8 macro for what I might use the 40/1.2 for. I just
>need
><<something in the 35-55 range, not too bulky...
><<Any suggestions?
>
>There are a good number of choices. The new Batis 40/2 and the Zony 55/1.8
>come to mind. I had rented the latter for a trip-- a bit more CA than
>expected for the price and doesn't have the Zeiss
>microcontrast, but is a very good lens. Eye AF can be quite helpful. I am
>definitively not sending back my CV 401/2 but it is not everyone's cuppa.
>
>Mike
Thanks Mike
I might consider the Batis 40/2. The 55/1.8 also looks nice and is less $$ than
the 40/2. I am really enjoying the 90/2.8.
Wayne
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|