I haven't noticed much difference between digital and film when it comes
to linear polarisers. I did find that the circular polarisers are less than
useless.
>
>> That's what I have been doing. I've been using the daylight film
>>equivalent of 3200K, but when you add any Wratten filter for B&W images
>>the camera corrects for the filter and you end up with an image that
>>looks like you were not using a filter at all. I found this out when I
>>was attempting to take B&W images of a bunch of green native punch grass,
>>using a variety of filters to enhance the green foliage. They all came
>>out identical to the non-filter image.
>
>Interestingly, I find a similar situation with polarizing filters.
>They just don't seem to be as effective on digital as they are on
>film.
>
Chris
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
- Hunter S. Thompson
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|