Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Telephoto reach, was Re: Back in the Fold

Subject: Re: [OM] Telephoto reach, was Re: Back in the Fold
From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayne.harridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:44:20 +1000
I'm not particularly wanting to start a trans Atlantic argument, but which is 
the better aircraft P51 or Spitfire ?

...Wayne



> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus <olympus-
> bounces+wayne.harridge=structuregraphs.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On
> Behalf Of ChrisB
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2019 4:49 PM
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [OM] Telephoto reach, was Re: Back in the Fold
> 
> That kit is tempting, Moose.
> 
> I was at our local airfield for its annual air show on Sunday.  In the past 
> I�ve
> manage some lovely shots because the crowd line has been very close to the
> display line.  Unfortunately, the crash of a Hunter T7 at Shoreham
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Shoreham_Airshow_crash> a few
> years ago has resulted in a tightening of those parameters, the result of
> which is that the aircraft are further away and higher.  My Fuji 50-230 zoom
> was not enough and I had to perform much cropping:
> 
> https://www.blipfoto.com/entry/2612364043737893378
> 
> Look at the extra shot below, of a P-51; it�s about 25% of the area of the
> original.  I could have done with a bit of �Moose Reach� that day.
> 
> Chris
> 
> [For what it�s worth, the tightening of the parameters was not a useful
> response to the accident.  The pilot had not flown the Hunter much, had
> flown a different aircraft for his Display Authorisation, and made mistakes in
> the manoeuvre that he flew (a loop, albeit a bit cranked).  The CAA still 
> allows
> pilots to receive DA flying a different aircraft (as far as I know) and they
> don�t have to fly the same manoeuvres in their display anyway.  The
> changes would not have made the horrible crash any less likely]
> 
> > On 26 Aug 19, at 23:18, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I opted to go with GX9s, for my second in a lifetime, but possibly last, 
> > trip
> through Bhutan. The 20 MP sensor is a real, although small, step up.
> Compared to even the E-M1 II, it reveals a tiny bit more clean detail. To
> someone prone to shoot at 800 mm -e and crop to 100%, that's significant. ;-)
> >
> > Separate EV dial, improved menus, a physical AF/MF switch and other stuff
> that escapes me at the moment, as I've not used the GX85 for a while.
> >
> > One of the benefits of both models is Panny's "Dual IS". Where Oly has only
> a couple of OIS lenses, and one gets their, no doubt spectacular, "Sync IS"
> with those couple of lenses and the top end bodies, for lots-o-dosh, These
> bodies work IS cooperatively with all their OIS lenses.
> 
> --
> __________________________________________________________
> _______
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz