I don't see your pessimism. When I got my first digital camera, a Sony R1, I
never thought I would be able to beat the higher ISO demon. Then Nikon came out
with the D3. And now, the D3's sensor is considered outdated and unusable by a
lot of internet "experts" although I don't agree. I was skeptical that as MP's
were increased to crazy levels (as far as I'm concerned, the 60+ mp cameras
have only two uses: for camera testers, and to make guys d**ks look bigger. But
I 'm now thinking that as things continue to evolve, many of the advances we
see in 1" and smaller sensors, this can eventually move to m4/3. The two
frontiers are higher MP counts, for cameras testers, and low light sensitivity,
for everyone.
But I'm generally an optimist, except about America's politics and our diets.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Steinman" <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 9:46:20 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Well, that sucks
> From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>>
>
> On 9/11/2019 3:21 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>
>>
>> I see m43 as an evolutionary dead-end as far
>> as format is concerned.
>
> I have trouble thinking what I would want from a format that ?4/3 doesn't
> deliver.
Me too! The E-M1.2 was the first camera since the OM-4 that made me giggle when
I first used it. I wouldn’t be bothered if it were the last camera I ever
owned.
Jan
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|