Looks like Heath Robinson contraptions seen from my side. Why should one have
to put up with the strain of the extra weight of a longer lens than needed AND
that of an adapter. So much for convenience too.
> Le 9 oct. 2019 à 19:54, Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> t if you *want* the 135mm field-of-view (for example), then the OM 200/4 with
> a focal reducer is going to be better than the unadorned OM 135/2.8.
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/