Jan,
I couldn't agree more. I have become concerned about Ken's mental state.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Steinman" <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 10:35:08 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] OM 100/2 lens
> From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
>> That seems to defy the laws of physics, but I agree, that it seems to have a
>> ?depth? look about it, even when stopped down.
>
> I think there are several OMZ lenses, I've personally experienced,
> that have this specific trait and do this regardless of aperture:
>
> 35/2
How do you get love out of this lens? Any hints or tricks? Any particular
subject material it likes?
My copy sits unused. They are so cheap, I’ve been unwilling to even try selling
it. (I think I did try selling it in 2012 or so, when I had a fit of “why am I
keeping this-itis,” but I couldn’t even get bids over my $100 starting point on
evilBay.)
Every time I put it on, I look through it, and although there’s nothing *wrong*
with what I see, neither is it inspiring, like some of the others you mention.
Jan
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|