Goodness gracious! I didn't mean to demean your corrections! I always
enjoy seeing what you can do with the photos I post. I don't always agree
but I do agree enough to make it well worth my while to see what you
suggest. The roll-over corrections are often a revelation to me about what
is possible.
Please continue to post!! I do mean C&C even if I don't always agree.
Thanks!
Tina
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 5:15 PM Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/12/2019 9:06 AM, Philippe wrote:
> > The thing is, as soon as you touch the noise, you have to address the
> remainder.
>
> SIGH . . .
>
> This was not, as I tried to say, about improving the photo. It was solely
> about how different NR tools work with various
> kinds of subjects and noise.
>
> I personally am not a fan of grain and noise. They have a place, but it's
> a very small place in my world. With DxO Prime
> NR and NeatImage v8, the landscape of NR tools has changed fairly
> recently. Now, with Topaz Denoise AI, the change is
> even more dramatic.
>
> So, I'm interested in how they work for me. I recently posted a shot of an
> Irish fairy illustrating how differently
> three products worked on a portrait shot @ ISO 3200.
>
> The Berlin Wall doesn't loom large in my legend. I don't find pictures of
> it or of its fall particularly interesting;
> they don't engage me emotionally. So when I saw this one, what I saw was
> the unusual noise pattern, I was slightly
> curious as to what had caused the noise gradient in the sky and more
> curious how NR tools would work on it.
>
> I will undoubtedly continue to play with NR tools. If folks don't want to
> see what I find, I'll stop going to the
> trouble of posting what I find.
>
> >> Le 12 nov. 2019 à 14:03, Tina Manley <tmanley@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> >>
> >> I prefer the grainy version, too. I do have Neat Image and Topaz
> DeNoise
> >> and Nik's noise remover but I don't use them much. If I do, I fade the
> >> effect by about 75%. I just like grain with film images.
> >>
> >> The blue tint to the photo is air pollution which was terrible in
> Berlin in
> >> 1989. That's really what it looked like.
>
> As above, and before, I'm not trying to improve your photo. Not that I'm
> not likely to make future suggestions that I
> think might improve some of the photos you post, from my perspective. You
> do, after all, always sign off with "C&C
> greatly appreciated."
>
> But in this case, I don't see anything that would "improve" it to the
> point where it was interesting to me, as a
> subject, rather than as a source for a technical exercise.
>
> Sorry, Philippe, but no, I don't have to address the remainder. :-)
>
> Silence is Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley
<http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html>
*https://www.alamy.com/portfolio/649596.html
<https://www.alamy.com/portfolio/649596.html>*
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|