Well, to each his own. Lengthy post-processing is not my cup of tea, to put it
mildly. I prefer to have a good image to begin with.
I am in Munich right now, carrying the GX80 and four lenses: the 2.5/14mm, the
1.7/20mm, the 2.8/30mm and the 35-100mm zoom. Once of the disadvantages of
superzooms is the limited maximum aperture. I was out and about last night, and
the smallest aperture I used was f2.8. Given that I am going to be in meetings
all day today and tomorrow, most of my photography will be after dark, so I
suspect the first two lenses mentioned are going to be used the most.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA
> On 2 Dec 2019, at 01:21, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/30/2019 6:37 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>> Walk today
>>
>> <http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/Nov19/SBeach__B300031.JPG>
>>
>> I've had the 12-200 for about 2 months now and still not sure what to think.
>> Not that sharp...but what do you expect for this zoom range. It really is a
>> great walk about, travel lens but wish it was a bit sharper like the 14-150.
>> Still have to bring the 9-18 but not necessary to switch nearly as much. I
>> was ready to return it but decided to give it a chance. What do you think?
>
> I dunno, looks pretty sharp to me. ;-)
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Mike/PuponRock.htm>
>
> For me, photography has broadened to include software. Would I rather carry
> larger, heavier gear, or spend a little on software and spend some time in
> post?
>
> I did some practical testing of this in our Fall seven weeks in New England
> and Ireland, shooting several casual days with Panny's 1" sensor 24-360 FF
> mm eq. superzoom.
>
> I have no definitive answer for myself, as yet, but it is a real question of
> trade-offs that didn't exist until fairly recently.
>
> Although not without their faults, among them lengthy processing*, but with
> capabilities undreamed of but on CSI until now, the change the equations.
>
> * You are building a powerhouse PC, no?
>
> Fence, Straddle, Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
