What’s funny about all this is that the (micro)four-third promise was that the
gear, lenses, and all that jazz would be as efficient while being lighter and
cooler to use.
What’s left of al of this?
If I may ask :-(
Amities
Philippe
> Le 3 déc. 2019 à 19:53, Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a
> écrit :
>
> Inquiring mind Moose writes:
>
> <<<I find the Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS lens of particular interest.
> It's a new thing, a lens with OIS, but not the Pro designation.
>
>
> Perhaps the above will be quite svelte given the speed. The constant F4.5 pro
> version looks big for travel and more like a FF lens, though it is still
> small for what it is.
>
> https://www.43rumors.com/leica-100-400mm-vs-the-new-olympus-150-400mm-size-comparison/
>
> I haven't seen a comparison shot with the 100-400 f5-6.3.
>
> Sore shoulders, Mike
>
> Pup looks great, btw but don't recall any such sharpness issues with the MZ
> 12-100/4.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|