Thanks for the insight, Mike. Sounds sensible to me.
On 12/20/19 3:56 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
Apparently how raw files are dealt with in the low extended ISO range is very
cam/Mfr specific.
Found this comment with no back up proof:
"The question is just, whether the raw file is affected by the extended ISO
setting or only the JPEG is. In other posts/articles, not referenced here, I saw
that indeed the raw file can be affected by extended settings, but not always. The
way depends on the camera model and manufacturer. In the case of EM1-II people are
saying that the digital information is processed towards highlight clipping,
improving S/N in less bright pixels (dynamic range at the cost of S/N). So extended
ISO remains useful for people that work with JPEGs out of the camera, but not the
ones who postprocess raw files...
For my needs I must conclude the extended ISO 64 and 100 are useless."
"People are saying" is not five-sigma proof, but seems to be what is out there.
Will tell Marnie ot use current base ISO and expose properly for now, Mike
--
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|