Yeah, I know, this esoteric exchange mostly between Wane and I, while riveting
to us and MikeG is a snoozer for most.
I really am curious how these photos, rescued from the shadows, appeal or don't and what you guess about when taken, and
with what.
Accidental "underexposure" when I had been shooting out an airplane window and forgot to change the EV setting from -1
1/3 that evening, indoors, in low light. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Misc/CarolDark.htm>
Honestly, I rather like it as shot, although with color correction, but at least with shadows raised a lot less than
this. My point is, this is not a contemporary camera, with claimed ISO invariance, or any such thing.
Intentional -1 EV to hold the sky. Again, it might look more interesting with the shadows raised a bit less, but this is
a demo. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Misc/Clouds.htm>
In the Dark Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|