DK about the first one and I’ll pass.
The second one might be a phonephoto as the altdotMoosed version shows massive
distortion in the buildings. I could be entirely wrong of course :-)
Amities
Philippe
> Le 28 déc. 2019 à 10:47, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> Yeah, I know, this esoteric exchange mostly between Wane and I, while
> riveting to us and MikeG is a snoozer for most.
>
> I really am curious how these photos, rescued from the shadows, appeal or
> don't and what you guess about when taken, and with what.
>
> Accidental "underexposure" when I had been shooting out an airplane window
> and forgot to change the EV setting from -1 1/3 that evening, indoors, in low
> light. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Misc/CarolDark.htm>
>
> Honestly, I rather like it as shot, although with color correction, but at
> least with shadows raised a lot less than this. My point is, this is not a
> contemporary camera, with claimed ISO invariance, or any such thing.
>
> Intentional -1 EV to hold the sky. Again, it might look more interesting with
> the shadows raised a bit less, but this is a demo.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Misc/Clouds.htm>
>
> In the Dark Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|