On 3/12/2020 11:54 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
This is probably a good illustration of how I think differently when
photographing color and B&W:
More concerned with the light and faces:
More concerned with the color and patterns
Intellectually, I "get" what you are saying, but not visually. My problem.
Yet, the comparison isn't "fair". I don't know how much is inherent in the originals and how much is processing, but
there are some big differences in contrast/tonality.
The contrast of the B&W shot is much higher than that of the color shot. I've shown reduced contrast, as well as, as
close as I can come, the contrast level of the color shot, which is really blah in B&W.
The color shot is low contrast, but high saturation. I've shown how much more natural, to my eye, lower saturation is.
I've then done a straight desaturation and a PS default B&W conversion, both low contrast, but pleasant. Finally, the
tone curve of the B&W shot applied to the color conversion to B&W, which has nice, dramatic "pop".
I realize your processing is aimed at sales. Of course, but it makes for an
unfair comparison of monochrome vs. color.
I think I prefer the B&W in this case but sometimes not.
Might that be, at least in part, because the composition of the color one is
The background on the left of the B&W shot is way too busy, distracting my eye, esp. from the kid on that side. The
color one replaces that with both a less busy background and a longer row of fish as foreground, concentrating attention
on the subject(s) and tying in beautifully as line with the reaching movement of the kind on the left.
Discerning Eye Moose
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/