TAKO. INTERNET SEIT 1996.
Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] The Problem of Display

Subject: Re: [OM] The Problem of Display
From: Wayne Shumaker <om3ti@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:00:52 -0700
At 11/10/2020 04:45 PM, Moose wrote:

>Out the kitchen window, I saw a still life*, provided by Mother Nature, a 
>spider web with stuff caught in it. I took it's picture, and like the result a 
>lot.
>
>As screen background, sized for my 24" monitor, 1920x1200 it's arresting, a  
>large, lighted image in a small, dim room.
>
>As an ~1200x900 image on Google Photos, it's nice, but not nearly AS nice. 
><https://photos.app.goo.gl/zVbaF5L8cVvNXq6v5>
>
>If you can view a ~1900x1200 image full screen, here it is. 
><http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Miscellaneous/Images&image=_A__4726_SCR.jpg>
>
>Google Photos, Flickr and SmugMug mess with large images, with not so good 
>downsampling.
>
>AKAG just posts large images, and lets the viewer deal with it. Or does he? 
>Here's what Win7 says about one of his recent images on Firefox: "1,920px Ã? 
>1,440px (scaled to 1,622px Ã? 1,217px)" If I right click and choose "View 
>Image" , I get the full resolution version. Switching between the two, it 
>seems that it loses something in translation.
>
>What sizes should I be posting? A good site for large, non-messed with images?
>
>Befuddled Sizes Moose
>
>
>* Temporarily still, as the next wind, from a different directions changed it 
>a lot, not for the better.

My kind of picture.

Nature is an artist. One of the reasons I rarely plan what I will shoot, and 
prefer to let the nature reveal itself.

I was hoping you had the answer on posting size...

WayneS
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>