At 7/16/2021 09:11 PM, C. U. wrote:
>On 7/16/2021 4:03 PM, Wayne Shumaker wrote:
>>At 7/11/2021 04:20 PM, you wrote:
>>>One our our first outings with Covid waning here (for the moment) was to
>>>these Botanical Gardens. Marnie had a gift certificate given to her by
>>>friends for her b'day that we
>>>finally felt we could use. Impetus for posting was first real trial of the
>>>the Siggie CU diopter with this walk around lens as well as use of my Ionic
>>>watch for geotagging--the latter went OK and was very convenient. You'll
>>>be the judge of the former but working distance is not good for critters.
>>>No image of major import but I thought perhaps pleasant enough to post.
>>>
>>>Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>https://www.olyendomike.com/Tower-Hill-Botanic-Garden-2021/
>>I was curious about the 12-100 with aml72 attached. It seems to have done
>>quite well with the California poppy. And the plane of focus is just right.
>>Zoomed in is nice.
>
>It should be a good match @ 1.7 diopter, assuming they get along optically. I
>use a 1.5 diopter Nikon 5T on my Panny 12-60 and am happy with it.
>
>The Oly 12-100 needs C-U help more than the Panny, as it has its closest focus
>at the short end and doesn't focus very close at the long end. One reason mine
>went away.
><http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Lenses/12-60%20vs%2012-100/12-60v100.htm>
>
>C. U. Moose
You say the Oly will get close but shades the subject, almost touching it. Is
this the Oly at the wide end rather than at 100mm for the closeup?
WayneS
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|