Frank and George:
i don't have either B-converters, only the A-ones (I am waiting for a B-TC).
My results with the 24 lens were of the 49mm A-28. Bad results, anyway (at
full aperture...). The same WC on the 35mm of my IS-1000 is far better (any
flare, but it is present even without converter). Looks I need an IS-3000
with G-40 and converters... on my Santa list.
Marco
----------
>Da: "George M." <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>A: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Oggetto: Re: [OM] Re[2]: IS-3 300mm and 28mm converters
>Data: Lun, 22 mar 1999 16:29
>
>>
>> The B-300, made for 135mm, is really best on this focal length but it
>> can also be used with good results on a 200/4. The versatility of the
>> tele-converter is better than of the wide-angle, IMHO.
>>
>> Frank van Lindert
>> Utrecht NL.
>> >
>
>
> Frank;
>
> Isn't the B-300 designed for use with a 180mm? (The tele for the IS-1
> would be 135)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|