> 1. Budget OM-1 or 2x-- close to the OM2000 in price but need to be a
real
> OM in terms of compatibilities (winder/md 2, 2-4,13 screens, TTL?)
> Around >$400? Would you like to buy such a camera in the next two
> years?
No
> 2. OM-4 Budget --Made with non-titanium metal and some plastic to
> make this an affordable OM-4. around $700 ± $100?
> Would you buy such a camera in the next two years?
Yes
> 3. OM-5Ti under $1500 --Most people seem to have expressed that this
> is to be manual focus with more features than the OM-4Ti. Would you buy
such a
> camera in 3-5 years?
Yes
1. Which one of the new OM bodies (OM reissues with possibly a few new
features, one under $500, one ca. $700, and an OM-5 under $1500) would you
buy in the next 2-5 years? Just one or two or all three? (You have to ask
your own pocketbook and your buying habit.)
1. An OM-4 in the $700 range.
2.Would you like to have an autofocusing OM-x? (Be honest. You don't need
to be realistic here.)
2. No
3. Would you be willing to have a somewhat larger OM body so that several
new features may be accommodated?
3. No
4. What is the single most important feature of the OM body that you would
like to see retained? Please narrow your preferences down to the single
feature. I will not count those votes with two items here.
4. Backwards compatibility with OM components.
Regards
Marco Paggi _ Italy
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|