Jees, why do they have to wait for someone to buy it before they'll fix it?
John
fdayrit@xxxxxxx wrote:
> john,
>
> i have seen this lens, it has been there quite sometime and i can tell you
> why. the 16mm is expensive and second the iris is not working properly. they
> offered to have it repaired if i bought it. the optics seemed to be in good
> shape. i did not see the 90 mm. they also have a 300mm 4.5 which looked to be
> in good shape but i just saw it thru the shop window. did not hold it. what
> was interesting was that it was displayed beside a sigma 300mm APO 4.0 for an
> EOS lens and guess which was more expensive? the oly by at least $100. don't
> know why?
>
> francis
>
> John Petrush wrote:
>
> > I was looking on a few web sites and came across
> > http://www.alkit.com/used15.html
> >
> > Offered on this page were a Zuiko 16mm f/3.5 fisheye for 699 and a Vivitar
> > 90mm f/2.8 macro for 99. I have no idea how current this is, but thought
> > I'd pass it along for the interested reader to further pursue.
> >
> > John P
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|