>Regarding miscellanious issues here is something I found out about my 85
>f2. I took it to a Giants ball game where we had nose bleed seats -- one
>row from the very top. I wanted to use my 85 instead of the 50 f1.8 because
>I "see" more like the 85. It was a bright, cloudless day and so very
>constrasty which makes focusing easy. I noticed with one lens(the 300mm
>f4.5) that infinity focus on the barrel is too far, i.e. out of focus. Now,
>I have learned from this august mailing list that this is not uncommon with
>long telephotos. But when I tried the 85 I was surprised!
>
>I couldn't turn the focusing ring far enough to get sharp(in focus) focus
>at infinity. I was using a screen with a split screen and could see that
>the image was not comletely lined up. And the image was ever so slightly
>fuzzy.
...
>Andre
>San Carlos, CA
>USA
Andre,
Does this happen with any other lens? When I noticed this, mostly with the
50/1.4 on my OM1N, I suspected the camera mirror for months (of course my
OM4 has built-in correction). Eventually, after many rolls with some
strangely unfocused photos, I was told at my annual medical that I had
astigmatism in my right eye.
I now wear spectacles and the problem is no more (or I use an eyecup with a
correction lens installed).
BTW, the OM Handbook states specifically that the 300/4.5 has a buffer at
the infinity end to allow for temperature changes, so you may reach
infinity before you get to the end.
Hope that this helps
Chris
____________________________________
Chris Barker <>< mailto:cmib@xxxxxxxxxxx
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|