Hmmmm.....I think I'd first try the 90mm and the T-8 with the large
reflector, and shoot just a tad off center to avoid glare. Possibly even
the 135mm macro with a short extension tube for increased working distance.
I've done insects and small animals that way and it works fairly well hand
held.
John P
______________________________________
there is no "never" - just long periods of "not yet".
there is no "always" - just long periods of "so far"
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald Reichle <dwreich@xxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 5:11 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Macro Flash comparisons
>Very nice comparisons. Could you do another set with a different
>subject?
>
>Imagine you are in a Document Library and you need to quickly copy some
>documents from about 4 X 8 to about 11 X 14 inches in size. You cannot
>use a tripod or other equipment to hold the camera but you can use
>flash.
>
>which (T8, T10, or T28) would give the best results? Which macro lens?
>
>Don Reichle
>
>John Petrush wrote:
>>
>> Picked up the slides from the lab this afternoon from the macro flash
>> comparison test. Point your browser of choice to
>> http://www.webgenuity.com/om.htm to see a more detailed explanation of
how
>> it was done and the results.
>>
>> John P
>> ______________________________________
>> there is no "never" - just long periods of "not yet".
>> there is no "always" - just long periods of "so far"
>>
>> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|