ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko

from Richard Schaetzl

Subject:	Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko
From:	Richard Schaetzl <Richard.Schaetzl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:14:40 +0100

PCACala@xxxxxxx wrote:

> The 04-84 date for
> introduction is wrong.  It was first mentioned in official literature 3-83.

With introduction you´re might be right, but not with fist mentioned in
Olympus literature.
I´ve an Olympus book of 1977 (!) which mentions an 100mm/2.0 lens "in
developing"

Regards

Richard

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] 100/2 zuiko, james olson Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, Gary Schloss Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, Alexander Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, Morgan Sparks Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, John Hermanson Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, PCACala Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, Richard Schaetzl <= Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, Pauls0627 Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, PCACala Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, Peter A. Klein Re[2]: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, JIM_TEO Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, PCACala

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, Morgan Sparks
Next by Date:	[OM] OM 2S, RK
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, PCACala
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 100/2 zuiko, Pauls0627
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]